As Campaign Heats Up, Untruths Can Become Facts Before They’re Undone
Washington Post | Jonathan Weisman
September 10, 2008
From the moment Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin declared that she had opposed the infamous “Bridge to Nowhere,” critics, the news media and nonpartisan fact checkers have called it a fabrication or, at best, a half-truth. But yesterday in Lebanon, Ohio, and again in Lancaster, Pa., she crossed that bridge again.
“I told Congress: ‘Thanks but no thanks for that Bridge to Nowhere up in Alaska,’ ” Palin told the crowds at the “McCain Street USA” rallies. “If we wanted a bridge, we’ll build it ourselves.”
Palin’s position on the bridge that would have linked Ketchikan to Gravina Island is one example of a candidate staying on message even when that message has been publicly discredited. Palin has continued to say she opposed a project she once campaigned for–then killed later, only after support for it had collapsed in Congress.
Interesting… If Palin did oppose the Bridge to Nowhere, how does she explain the $40 million she spent building an access road to the site of the proposed bridge?
Read this Salon article from 2005 about the Bridge to Nowhere.
Post a Comment